photos
Jonas Rask's review and example pictures helped me make the decision. tl;dr Is it worth its price? If you're into macro photography I'd say yes. Unboxing It's heavy! The sound and feeling as if something in the lens is loose is normal and disappears when you turn on the camera Settings Too little haptic feedback …
Comparing the Fujinon 100-400mm without and with the teleconverter XF1.4X, on a tripod. Pictured: Kraftwerk Birsfelden, built 1953/54 by Hans Hofmann. At 100mm: At 400mm: Mittlere Brücke in Basel, seen from Johanniterbrücke, very windy weather. At 400mm: At 100mm:
Day 1 and 2 with the Fujinon 10-24mm on the X-T10. The pictures are cropped, but I didn't correct any perspective distortion. Above: Rosshof, built 1984-87 by Naef, Studer und Studer. Wildt'sches Haus, built 17627/63 by Johann Jakob Fechter for Jeremias Wildt-Socin. Museum der Kulturen Münster Very pleased by the amazing quality - which David …
On imaging-resource.com you can compare pictures of a long list of cameras. Really helpful! Go to Camera Reviews - Compare Images, choose the two cameras you want to compare and the same picture in both columns. Then click on Full Size Image for both pictures to compare the details side by side. Left: Fujifilm X30, …
In my opinion the extension tubes MCEX-11 & MCEX-16 are not a must if you already have a macro lens, but are useful if you'd like to use your other lenses for macro. The three pictures below are handheld, using both tubes at once, and only cropped to square. --- 60mm macro with MCEX-11 (Xylocopa …
Continue reading "Extension tubes MCEX-11 and MCEX-16, with X-T1 and X-T10"
I had difficulties connecting the Fujifilm X-T1 to the Camera remote app. This was the solution: "I have found that I was having trouble connecting an iPhone to the X-T1's wi-fi until I pressed the OK/Menu button while the phone was trying to connect." Thank you, westofwy.
A comparison of the film simulation modes for the X100s. I have highlights and shadows set to -1. The descriptions are Fujifilm's own. Provia/standard - ideal for a wide range of subjects Velvia/vivid - vibrant reproduction, ideal for landscape and nature [I don't agree! ;-) ] Astia/soft - softer color and contrast for a more …
See also Raynox DCR-250 for macro, December 2013. I did some tests and the tele converter is better suited for the kind of macro pictures I want to take (pictures 1-8) than the DCR-250 (picture 9): the pictures are sharper, there is more depth of field available and the tele converter has many other uses …
I read somewhere that the tele converter for the X100s doesn't make much of a difference. I don't agree.
manu schwendener 